discipline judicial conduct and to inspect judges’ handling of public funds allocated to the judiciary. By contrast to the insufficient bill currently in Congress for the Judicial Transparency and Ethics Enhancement Act, which would apply only to the federal judiciary, the new mechanism must be operated by an external body whose members will not be recommended, let alone appointed, by the judiciary, and which will receive and investigate judicial conduct complaints against, apply disciplinary measures to, and make recommendations for the impeachment of, any members of the judiciary, including the justices of the Supreme Court.
35. The members of the class action may receive collective redress for their grievances in the form of appellate review of their cases or new trials, and perhaps even compensation from:
a. individual judges found liable for the harm that they inflicted through their wrongdoing
b. judicial governing bodies or entities servicing the judiciary found liable for having assisted judges in their wrongdoing or covered up for them; and/or
c. the Federal government since the Federal Judiciary is a branch of the U.S. Government.
36. Among the preliminary steps that can be taken in the process of selecting the professionals of the virtual firm of lawyers and investigative journalists are the following:
a. examine their complaints against the judiciary as stated in their websites, court documents filed by them, and talk shows
b. check the person’s name, address, resume, and entries in professional directories;
c. require of a person that has expressed interest in joining the firm to submit a written statement indicating, in light of this proposal:
1) the reasons for wanting to join the firm in terms of its mission and objectives;
2) academic and professional qualifications to carry out any of the tasks described above;
d. provide samples of his or her work.
37. It should be evident that a person that does not want to bother to read this proposal and provide the requested information is neither committed to the entities and individuals’ common mission nor realizes how much work will be required to accomplish it or attain the firm’s objectives. Just as easily as he or she would like to join, he or she would quit the firm, leaving everybody else burdened with the work that had been assigned to that person, perhaps when the pressure of an approaching key date was mounting. That is not a promising way of running a firm, particularly since the mission is to enforce discipline and accountability on the tightly-knitted web of bankruptcy fraud schemers and well-coordinated peers of the Third Branch of Government.
Comments on this Programmatic Proposal and inquiries about joining the firm are welcome and may be e-mailed to DrRCordero@Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org.
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org
59 Crescent Street
Brooklyn, NY 11208-1515
tel. (718)827-9521
©2006 Richard Cordero. All rights reserved. Permission is granted for distribution without modification.
1/ 2/ 3/ 4/ 5/ 6/ 7/ 8/ 9/ 10; all in PDF Summary in PDF Table of Tasks