Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org*

        as of September 25, 2006

Statement of Facts

providing evidence showing that

a federal judgeship has become a safe haven for wrongdoing

due to lack of an effective mechanism of judicial conduct control and

calling for the formation of a virtual firm of lawyers and investigative journalists

to help prepare pro bono a class action based on a representative case charging

that Chief Judge John M. Walker, Jr., and Circuit Judge Dennis Jacobs of

the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit have engaged in

a series of acts of disregard for the law, the rules, and the facts, and

of systematic dismissal of judicial misconduct complaints

forming a pattern of non-coincidental, intentional, and coordinated wrongdoing

that protects peers and other schemers involved in a bankruptcy fraud scheme

Table of Contents

I.   Evidence gathered in 12 cases over 5 years supporting this Statement and the representative case

II. The pattern of wrongful acts in support of a bankruptcy fraud scheme began with the summary dismissal by Judge John C. Ninfo, II, WBNY, of Dr. Cordero’s cross-claims against Trustee Kenneth Gordon in Pfuntner v. Trustee Gordon et al.

A.   C.J. Walker and J. Jacobs have been made aware of the evidence of judges’ bias and disregard for the rule of law but have refused to investigate them, thus failing to safeguard judicial integrity and protect Dr. Cordero from their abuse

III.  CJ Walker and J. Jacobs are protecting their peers by refusing to Follow the money! to find over $670,000 unaccounted for in just one out of one trustee’s more than 3,900 cases, i.e., In re DeLano, for following it could lead to the exposure of a bankruptcy fraud scheme and the schemers

IV. Call for a virtual firm of lawyers and investigative journalists to help prepare pro bono a class action centered on a representative case against these judges to expose the systematic dismissal of complaints supporting a bankruptcy fraud scheme and reveal how high and to what extent wrongdoing has reached

**********************************

I.    Evidence gathered in 12 cases over 5 years supporting the Statement and representative case

1.   The herein discussed query whether a federal judgeship is a safe haven for wrongdoing and the concrete charges of such wrongdoing arise from evidence collected during the past five years from 11 related cases. (ToEC:1)[1] Such evidence indicates that the wrongdoing is motivated by a most insidious corruptor: money, the enormous amount of money at stake in fraudulent bankruptcies. (findings leading to the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Prevention Act (BAPCPA) of 2005, Pub.L. 109-8, 119 Stat. 23 and Pst:1395)